Working Group meeting

Date: 17/05/2022
Participants: Cecile Guasch, Natalie Muric, Georgia Lodi
Model editor: Eugeniu Costetchi
Note editor: Andreea Pasăre

Agenda

  • Collect feedback on the refactored model === Discussion

  • Presenting the document from CPSV: comparison between the CPSV-AP approach and the ePO approach.

    • A Concession Contract is a new specific type of Contract.

    • Adding this as a new class in the ePO model, epo:ConcessionContract.

    • The definition can be taken from the Directive 2014/23/EU ==== Overview diagrams for the ePO model

  • Overview

  • Phase views

  • Monetary values

  • Aspect views for:

    • Procurement objects

    • Techniques

    • Strategic procurement

    • Criterion

    • Terms

    • Agents

    • Location

    • Roles

    • Documents

    • Contextual information

    • Notice description

    • Data types

  • The Glossary is under development and will be available in the HTML format.

  • Planning to publish 3.0.0 beta by July 2022

  • Revise, collect and implement the feedback

  • Publish 3.0.0 by mid-July 2022

  • We might not have all the definitions in place yet.

  • Proposing to put all epo classes in a flat list when publishing the model.

  • The Lot is not subject to the Contract Term; it foresees the Contract Term.

  • Contract terms are foreseen in the Lot and in the Contract they are used.

Decisions

On extending the core vocabularies

  • If we are sure that the concepts in the Core Vocab cover everything that we have in the ePO model we can use it directly.

  • If we need additional things typical to the domain we should extend the model.

Action points

  1. The Glossary is under development and will be available in the HTML format.

  2. We might not have all the definitions in place yet.

    1. Propose definitions and review them in a future working group meeting.

    2. Propose definitions for new classes

    3. Propose definitions for new attributes

    4. Propose definitions for relations

    5. Prepare an inventory worksheet for the WG to easily discuss

  3. The ePO model should be able to directly use CCCEV.

    1. Revise the model with Natalie

  4. Check alignment to Core (namespace, definitions)

    1. Follow the rule of thumb: reuse if identical meaning and extend if the meaning is slightly changed (i.e. new attributes or relations)

    2. Check:

      1. Location

      2. Person

      3. Organisation

      4. CCCEV

  5. Create a new epo:Term subclass, epo:ContractSpecificTerm which is a generalisation for epo:ContractTerm.

  6. Create a new epo:ConcessionContract.

    1. Copy from CPSV-AP V3.0