Untitled :: TED Developer Documentation

Working Group meeting

Date: 23/01/2024
Participants: Paloma Arillo, Natalie Muric, Giovanni Paolo Sellitto, Dragos Stoica, Pascaline Laure Tchienehom

Model editor: Andreea Pasăre
Note editor: Achilles Dougalis

Agenda

Continue collecting eSubmission requirements.

In the first instance, eSubmission will be based on the ESPD Response. We would like your input concerning use cases on data coming from ESPD Responses

Discussion

There is a problem with Power of attorney . A person has a power of attorney and it is not a role. The ESPD model appears to conflate Person and PowerOfAttorney. The modeling in UBL was consulted (https://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/UBL-2.4.html) where the PowerOfAttorney exists, which is a document that has an AgentParty.
- The Implementing Regulation for ESPD was consulted (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0007).[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0007).]
- A person can represent an organization and have power of attorney (a capability). This power of attorney is a legal document. The mandate (also a document) contains the context in which the power of attorney works.
- How should the ePO implement the power of attorney?
  - Should it be implemented as a document, with a Person connected with the power of attorney as well as the organization?
Cac::DocumentReference: Is a class to define a reference to a document (Document Reference) A reference to the evidentiary document (Evidence) / A reference to a document relevant to this certificate or an application for this certificate (Certificate). We have this in ePO as a *Certificate *(foaf:Person hasCertification epo:Certificate, etc).
We do not have examples of the xml for mandate document.
- We will create an attribute epo.hasAdditionalDocumentIdentifier
- A mandate is a token that a person can have, for example in Italy the EIDS token may be used to provide all the mandates/power of attorneys of a given person.
- We could model the legal representative of the organization, without the Power of attorney. the legal representative of an organization has a mandate to fulfill and may give someone else the power of attorney.
- It seems that power of attorney differs from country to country. Maybe we should avoid the words power of Attorney, and use something like: *isLegallyRepresentedBy *a person, and connect this Person to a Certificate in ePO with 2 possible specialisations PowerOfAttorney and Mandate. Unless there is a use case for the specialisations they should not be implemented at this point.
It was discussed whether or how cac:Evidence cac:EvidenceSupplied should be implemented in the ePO. In the ePO, we will merge these two terms into one concept.
espd:FinancialRatioType: Is a technical code list that we do not need to implement in the ePO.
For the access-right code list, the ESPD uses only the values "confidential" _or "_public".
By the end of the week we will have the draft of the ORSD document.

Action Points

Create an issue on how the ESPD models the power of Attorney. We should ask them if there is a conflation between the concept of a person and PowerOfAttorney document.
Create an issue in the ESPD github stating that the link of cac:ResidenceAddress to the at-voc::country is missing in the ESPD document.
Edit Github issue 502. (https://github.com/OP-TED/ePO/issues/502)