Working Group meeting
Date: 28/11/2024
Participants: Victorio Bentivogli, Natalie Muric
Model editor: Andreea Pasare
Note editor: Achilles Dougalis
Agenda
-
To discuss definitions for epo:resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome and epo:FurtherStageAwardOutcome in a future WGM.
-
re-discuss #592
-
#678 - find definitions for both predicates (epo:definesEstimatedContractDuration and epo:definesContractDuration) in the next WGM
Discussions
-
Issuehttps://github.com/OP-TED/ePO/issues/712[ #712] was discussed again. Predicates were modified,
It was decided that data examples would be made using the existing model:
-
It was noted thatIn eForms, under specific circumstances such as the re-publication of a Notice , a newly published notice may use the same Unique identifier of an older Notice (for Example, case with unpublished fields). However, the field OPP-010-notice changes (mapped in epo as epo:Notice / rdf:PlainLiteral |?this epo:hasNoticePublicationNumber ?value ) will have a different value, and could be used to differentiate between the two notices.
-
https://github.com/OP-TED/ePO/issues/678[#]678 was discussed. The following definitions were added:
-
epo:hasContractDuration Relation indicating a Contract has a Duration.
-
epo:hasEstimatedContractDuration Relation indicating a Contract has an estimated Duration.
-
-
#592 was updated: "epo:hasEstimatedDuration" definition:
"Relation indicating a Dynamic Purchase system has an estimated duration".
-
The following predicates definitions were changed:
-
epo:hasValidityPeriod
-
epo:hasEstimatedValidityPeriod
-
-
#708 was updated
Action Points
-
Ask the eforms team to create rdf data examples of BT-195( 106) using the model described in Issue #712
