Working Group meeting 01/12/2020
Participants: Paloma Arillo Aranda, Giorgia Lodi, Natalie Muric, Helder Santos, Juan Carlos Segura Fernández-Carnicero, Giampaolo Sellitto, and Enric Staromiejski.
Topic of discussion: Review of the minutes from the 24th and 26th November 2020
-
We modified the minutes from the past 24th of November 2020 to reword some sentences that needed clarification.
-
The axiom "epo:CentralPurchasingBody epo:has epo:Buyer profile" was finally removed from the EAP file, since it had been indicated in the minutes but was not applied yet.
-
A new axiom "epo:Buyer epo:hasBuyerProfile epo:BuyerProfile" has been created in v2.0.2, this way this version is harmonised to v2.0.1 (in the previous v2.0.2 version the subject was epo:Agent). In v2.0.1 the predicate is still "epo:has", since we cannot change it due to the TED-RDF mapping (currently ongoing).
-
The property "usesBuyerProfile", between "epo:Agent" and "epo:BuyerProfile" has been removed: it does not bring any semantics that can be correctly interpreted in eNotification.
Topic of discussion: Issues
The following issues were discussed, and many of them closed. Follow the links to get into the discussion and how it has been/is being solved:
-
[Issue #253](https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/253)
-
[Issue #254](https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/254)
-
[Issue #258](https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/258)
-
[Issue #250](https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/250)
-
[Issue #249](https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/249)
-
[Issue #251](https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/251)
-
[Issue #268](https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/268)
-
[Issue #248](https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/248)
-
[Issue #269](https://github.com/eprocurementontology/eprocurementontology/issues/269)
