Working Group meeting 27/05/2021
Participants: Paloma Arillo Aranda (OP), Cécile Guasch (ISA2 - DIGIT), Hilde Kjolset (dfø), Giorgia Lodi (ISTC-CNR), Natalie Muric (OP) and Giampaolo Sellitto (ANAC).
Topic of discussion: Definitions – predicates
The following relations were discussed and compared with the html conventions to see if this work will correct the inconsistencies:
-
Subject: ContractModificationNotice
Predicate: ‘modifies’ is replaced with ‘announcesModification’
Object: Contract
-
Subject: Procedure
Predicate: uses
Object: AccessTerm
Inverse: isSubjectTo
-
Subject: PlannedProcurementPart
Predicate: uses
Object: Channel
This relation is deleted as it is not required in the mapping.
-
Subject: FrameworkAgreementTechnique
Predicate: uses
Object: EAuctionTechnique
This relation is deleted as it is not required in the mapping. It is not clear if FrameworkAgreement or the FrameworkAgreementTechnique uses the eAuctionTechnique.
-
Subject: Procedure
Predicate: uses
Object: ExclusionGround
The CCCEV has to be revisit as this relation needs to be changed. Lot should specify the procurement criterion which should in turn be related to the CCCEV.
-
Subject: LotGroup
Predicate: uses
Object: ‘FrameworkAgreementTechnique’ replaced with ‘Technique’ as FrameworkAgreementTechnique is a Technique
Definition: Relation indicating that a lot or a grouplot uses a technique
Inverse: is UsedBy
This needs to be checked in more detail.
-
Subject: Lot
Predicate: uses
Object: Technique
Some definitions have been added to the relations discussed on 18 and 25 May. The minutes have been updated.