Working Group meeting

Date: 19/10/2021
Participants: Natalie Muric, Giovanni Paolo Sellitto
Model editor: Eugen Costezki
Note editor: Andreea Pas─âre

Agenda:

  • modelling structure of the Notices.

Discussion

There is a dependency between Organisation Role and Organisation Subrole in the eForms, but not in the eForms excel.
The first UML model draft for eForms excel has been created.
Organisation attributes should be linked to the Lot, the Procedure, etc. based on the description from the eForms excel. The same applies to other BGs.
According to the eForms, the place of performance can change per Lot, so we should be able to see this from the UML diagram as well.

Lot does not exist as a BG or BT in the eForms excel. It is only specified in the description.

Place of performance is filled backwards because it is easier to add a single place and mention that it applies to many lots.
Eg: Place of performance London applies to Lot 1, 2 and 3

We need to add a perspective to modeling the structure of the Notices in order to avoid having issues when applying this to RDF data.

Might be useful to see what are the parts of a Planning Form, Competition Form, DAP, etc.

Diagram Notice with 3rd dimension:

Represent as well as possible the logic of the Notices.

kyPpNY37wYAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

Diagram Previous Planning instance example:
Choice 1:

j91okVeP1i0OQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==

Choice 2:

eiFs7FBUUdgnfFOUIMBmHJyFKxHKOeFdS3oM3YfgjBekMkRfJrRHB+16ucOtTJPw7Af+bABQMsSnKEeEnmRIoJ8wWseZwULtQPjDwrUH8Sz0QPxEPBbMVeLPlfwuRc64UypHYes+E9P8BK2l95hCF4DgAAAAASUVORK5CYII=

Choice 3:

1xC4Rne+XQqHsWd5vXHdEkr0nCQj1xC5BPUGh7G3IQAGKgXqCsl1QT1AoexslkqCeoKQC9QSFsrc5QJ74f5GDzA7yF3F9AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

Choice 4:

pcR4ToPZD3QAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==

Questions

  • Is it valuable to further specify phases for Notices? Might not be that useful at this moment.

  • Should we replicate this for other eForms?