We need a consistent way of mapping for section 5 whether we have the lot number or the contract number.

It was agreed that if the lot was not mentioned and there was only one lot, the lot was taken from section II.

How to approach the mappings if we have multiple lots, but without the lot numbers specified.

if there is no award there is no contract and therefore there is no instantiation

If the contract is awarded you can infer from the ontology that the contract exists.

I’m not sure therefore that we have to create a link that can be inferred.

The title could be for the lot if it is a non-award.

If awarded then the title will be the contract title.

If non-award then the title will be the lot title.

If we have a contract number, the RDF should have one as well.

If we have a lot number, the RDF should have one as well.

The excel maps correctly to the authority table economic-operator-size however the rdf shows a boolean see 348503-2021

The authority table is not listed in the resources

This needs to be documented in the mappings: although in xml we say it does not exist we need to explain that.