Working Group meeting

Date: 27/09/2022
Participants: Natalie Muric, Csongor Nyulas, Garcia Merino, Mauro
Model editor: Andreea Pasăre
Note editor: Andreea Pasăre

Agenda

  • Discuss GH issues for F03 standard form mappings

    • 187

Discuss

Github 187

  • We need a consistent way of mapping for section 5 whether we have the lot number or the contract number.

  • It was agreed that if the lot was not mentioned and there was only one lot, the lot was taken from section II.

  • How to approach the mappings if we have multiple lots, but without the lot numbers specified.

  • if there is no award there is no contract and therefore there is no instantiation

  • If the contract is awarded you can infer from the ontology that the contract exists.

  • I’m not sure therefore that we have to create a link that can be inferred.

  • The title could be for the lot if it is a non-award.

  • If awarded then the title will be the contract title.

  • If non-award then the title will be the lot title.

  • If we have a contract number, the RDF should have one as well.

  • If we have a lot number, the RDF should have one as well.

Github 126

  • The excel maps correctly to the authority table economic-operator-size however the rdf shows a boolean see 348503-2021

  • The authority table is not listed in the resources

  • This needs to be documented in the mappings: although in xml we say it does not exist we need to explain that.