Working Group Meeting
Date: 29/04/2025
Participants: Gabriele Dall, Ansgar Mondorf, Natalie Muric, Andreas Schmitz
Model editor: Andreea Passare
Note editor: Achilles Dougalis
Discussion
-
The eQualification Diagram "evidence request, submission and receipt" was presented, discussed, and approved.
-
The eQualification Diagram "qualification response" was presented, discussed, and approved.
-
It was argued whether class
cccev:Evidenceshould point at theepo:ProcurementCriterionclass. It was decided that this is not necessary. -
It was also noted that
epo:ProcurementCriterionis already linked to theepo:Lotclass. -
Attribute
epo:isQualifiedwas added on classepo-qua:QualificationDecisionInformation.
-
The eAwarding diagram "award decision notification" was presented, discussed, and approved.
-
Attribute
epo-awa:hasStandStillPeriodEndDatewas added at the level ofepo-awa:AwardDecisionNotification
-
The eRequest diagram "request for offer" was presented, discussed, and approved.
-
UBL request for Quotation (used for eRequest) was discussed.
-
After presenting all the diagrams, the WG decided that eQualification, eAwarding and eRequest modules can be published.
-
It was decided that the
epo-eva:UniqueResponsibleOfTheProcurementshould be moved to ePO core.
-
A number of remarks for PEPPOL’s use of UBL transactions were made. Specifically:
-
The use of UBL’s Qualification application Request schema for PEPPOL’s T019 Qualification was discussed. It was mentioned that in PEPPOL the roles are inverted from the roles in UBL 2.2.
-
It was mentioned that PEPPOL uses the T004 Call for tenders transaction to model Closed procedures, and also to request for Evidence.
-
It was mentioned that PEPPOL’s T024 invitation to tender has no qualification part and is also used for the purpose of UBL’s Request for Quotation.
-
It was mentioned that the difference between a request for offer and a request for Tender, is that the former has a line (as it is based on a catalogue), and the latter does not have a line.
-
